19lb 4oz 
blimey what a size well done
blimey what a size well done
Great ouse monster
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 cushty1 |
|||
|
Posts: 70 (19/11/07 16:54) |
|
||
|
Linkledger |
|||
|
Posts: 232 (19/11/07 17:00) |
Hope there is no computer jiggery pokery going on with the photo.
Great fish fabulous looking creature. Truly well done
|
||
|
New Temer |
|||
|
Posts: 185 (19/11/07 17:06) |
Fantastic looking fish. Nice early xmas pressie.
atb ian Tight lines ian |
||
|
Hugo Curgudgeon |
|||
|
Posts: 335 (19/11/07 17:12) |
Wonderful fish!
Very, very well done Tight lines and regards Hugo |
||
|
Warren gaunt |
|||
|
Posts: 64 (19/11/07 17:46) |
One very big fish, odd picture, i keep coming back to it. Blokes head dont look right compared to all other focusing points. Must be me needing glasses!
Well done. |
||
|
Warren gaunt |
|||
|
Posts: 65 (19/11/07 17:50) |
The more i look the more i see, that pic aint right.
|
||
|
Warren gaunt |
|||
|
Posts: 66 (19/11/07 17:51) |
Looks like photoshop job
Last Edited By: Warren gaunt
19/11/07 18:04.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
Warren gaunt |
|||
|
Posts: 67 (19/11/07 17:53) |
As you look at pic, between fish head and his head you can see the back ground is wrong.
|
||
|
Michael Townsend |
|||
|
Posts: 1 (19/11/07 17:58) |
The photo seems dodgy to me.
There is a distinct line around the persons head and a shadow around the right hand shoulder. The rest of the pic is fine. If it is genuine, well done. If not shame on you. |
||
|
kwhitcombe |
|||
|
Posts: 512 (19/11/07 18:02) |
I must admit , when i first saw the picture i thought photo shop straight away, BUT, i honestly think its just because its such a huge fish, you dont see fish
of that size very often. I really do hope its a genuine fish and i have absolutly no reason to doubt it. Many congratulations from me and very well
done.
Get out there and get wet!!!
|
||
|
Michael Townsend |
|||
|
Posts: 2 (19/11/07 18:04) |
Lok at the captors head not the fish.
|
||
|
Michael Townsend |
|||
|
Posts: 3 (19/11/07 18:05) |
He's got a halo!
|
||
|
Linkledger |
|||
|
Posts: 233 (19/11/07 18:06) |
Linkledger wrote: If anyone thinks I meant anything by my joking remark about the picture they are very wrong.
|
||
|
Warren gaunt |
|||
|
Posts: 68 (19/11/07 18:18) |
Yeah, i might need glasses, stunning fish, must be the early morning light.
|
||
|
Cornovii |
|||
|
Posts: 686 (19/11/07 18:35) |
Michael, The 'halo' as you put it, is nothing unusual buddy, it's a very common occurrence in photography when the subject is backlite. The natural sunlight (in this case) shinning through the subjects very short hair. Nothing fishy about the pic IMO. Dazza. |
||
|
Tigersman |
|||
|
Posts: 1160 (19/11/07 18:37) |
Why is there
always>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a doubting Thomas, if not more than one? Paul |
||
|
Warren gaunt |
|||
|
Posts: 69 (19/11/07 18:41) |
Because there are so many lying f***wits around doing a wrong un in the forums and the press. Prize money going where it shouldnt be and top 50 lists with
utter bullshit within them.
Now this one is probably ok, and i've just be told via good source that Ray H came down and did the pics, so on that note, again, well done, i want one of those. |
||
|
TemeLAD |
|||
|
Posts: 178 (19/11/07 18:44) |
Neil,
Well done! - that is one stunning looking specimen - looks cold too, is that frost on them there leaves in the background. Stuff that dreams are made of - brilliant! Cheers Les
"Politeness costs nothing. Nothing, that is, to him that shows it, but often costs the world very dear"
William Allingham, poet 1824-1889 |
||
|
Tigersman |
|||
|
Posts: 1162 (19/11/07 18:47) |
Actual fact Warren that is why I no longer post my catch details I'm fed up with folks doubting the authenticity of the fish.
End of the day It's no good kidding yourself let alone everyone else. It doesn't prove anything. Paul |
||
|
Michael Townsend |
|||
|
Posts: 4 (19/11/07 18:49) |
Yep as I said well done, but it looks dodgy because of the halo.
Fair play to the lad and I genuinlely mean that. But you've got to say that the photo looks a bit strange. |
||
- BFW Barbel Talk
- BFW River Reports
- BFW Other Species Fishing board
- BFW Social board
- BFW Barbel basics
- BFW Members
- BFW Swim Analysis
- Technical help
- Barbel and Fishing Classified
- Miscellaneous Classified
- Archive 1
- Archive 2
- Archive 3
- Archive 4
- Archive 5
- Archive 6
- Archive 7
- Archive 8
- Archive 9
- Archive 10
- Archive 11
- Archive 12
- Archive 13
- Archive 14
- Archive 15
- Archive 16
- Archive 17
- Archive 28
- Archive 29
- Archive 30
- Archive 31
- Archive 32
- Archive 33
- Archive 34
- Archive 35
- Archive 36
- Archive 37
- Archive 38
- Archive 39
- Archive 40
- Archive 41
- Archive 42
- Archive 43
- Archive 44
- Archive 45
- Archive 46
- FAQ topics
- 2001 to 2002 Season River Reports
- 2002 to 2003 Season River Reports
- 2003 to 2004 Season River Reports
- 2004 to 2005 Season River Reports
- 2005 to 2006 Season River Reports
- 2006 to 2007 Season River Reports
- 2007 to 2008 Season River Reports
- Moderators area
- Admin
Quick Reply
